Platform Ideas and Improvements

Right now delelete a scenario is one-way, with no recovery option. Please ... add trash folder (maybe with automatic deletion after xx days) to recover deleted scenarios. Join this with versioning, and we have a more robust solution to avoid pitfalls.

When developing new scenarios it's a pain to deal with testing/dev data. Fx. I get a webhook as a trigger for the scanerio and I have a bunch of modules in the scenario, that all use data from the webhook. Why can't I use the data from the webhook when running a single module? Faking data can often cause production error, because the data wasn't real. If I have already run a module and need the output in following module, why can't I use the output from that first module, when running the second module only? ---------------------------------------- SEE ALSO: Incomplete executions: https://support.integromat.com/hc/en-us/articles/360001988854-Incomplete-executions Enable "Choose Where To Start" for instant triggers / webhooks: https://integromat.canny.io/feature-requests/p/enable-choose-where-to-start-for-instant-triggers-webhooks Ability to "re-run" historical instances: https://integromat.canny.io/feature-requests/p/ability-to-re-run-historical-instances

We can start with a graph/dashboard to view which scenarios have used what percentage of the operations/data allowance for that month.

Enable error handling also for: the whole scenario sequences of modules module's Initialization phase (currently only available for the module's Operation phase) verification of connections (takes place before the Initialization phase) ------- I don't know if I've missed a feature, but I find attaching error handlers to single modules pretty laborious. I think it would be helpful to have some kind of catch all error handling module. On one side it could be for the whole scenario, but it could maybe also behave like the router. Meaning, all modules attached after that error handling module, will be sort of sandboxed, and any error occurring in that box gets routed to other modules that should handle that error. And you could have multiple "sandboxes" in one scenario. Nested Sandboxes should pass on the error to the parent sandbox, if it can't handle it. Chris Hintz: The lack of error handling during the init phase of modules (concerns) mainly business users which need to trust that once 'activated' scenario's keep running. As long as business users cannot trust activated scenario's I believe Intergromat cannot grow in that market.

Would be useful to have an "Escape JSON" function same you for Escape HTML. Thanks

Better Custom Templates we can Import/Export just like "Cloning" Feature This would allow new users to import a blueprint, then being asked to set up the necessary connections like Google Sheets and it would automatically update in all modules. Cloning already does this. When importing a blueprint this doesn't work. ---------------------------- BEST PRACTICE: How to share templates as blueprints: Open a template and click on "Create new scenario from template". Don't follow the steps. Only press CTRL+S (Windows) or CMD+S (Mac). You will get a pop-up saying "The scenario was saved.". Go to your list of scenarios and look for the one, with the name of the template. Export the blueprint. How to share your templates: If you have Teams plan (see here: https://www.make.com/en/pricing ) you can share templates within your team.

Adam: filter to sort through scenario by name, date created, etc... subfolders include folders in the list filtering of scenarios (by usage, name, etc.) sorting of scenarios (by usage, name, date created, last edit, etc.) (multi)selecting scenarios and folders deleting selected scenarios and folders copying selected scenarios and folders moving selected scenarios and folders

It's impossible to set up a first mandatory condition and pair it with a bunch of accessory conditions to filter data. Nesting "or" conditions into one "and" condition is quite frequent, especially when your scenario is meant to process a lot of data. Is it possible to setup a filter as follows: X AND (A OR B OR C OR D .... ). I know I can do (A AND X ) OR (B AND X) OR (C AND X) .... but I was hoping to avoid that extra work. ------------------------- BEST PRACTICE: Employ two filters with a dummy Router module between them: first with the mandatory condition and second with a bunch of accessory conditions. SEE ALSO: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disjunctive_normal_form https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjunctive_normal_form

By: Connection Webhook Key Device Data store Data structure App (including the version) Module Fulltext search Number of Operation Make it easy to see a list of all the scenarios using a specific connection. ---------------------------------- BEST PRACTICE: To determine which scenario is using a given resource (Connection / Webhook / Key / Device / Data store) proceed as follows: WARNING: PROCEED ONLY WHEN YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY SURE THERE IS AT LEAST ONE SCENARIO EMPLOYING THE GIVEN RESOURCE! USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. Click on the corresponding resource menu item in the left vertical menu: Connections / Webhooks / Keys / Devices / Data stores. Locate the given resource. Click on the "Delete" button. Confirm by clicking it again. A popup will appear listing all the scenarios using the given resource. CLICK ANYWHERE OUTSIDE THE POPUP TO CLOSE IT.